Insights

What is stock vesting and what is typical?

Stock vesting is a legal and risk management tool by which a person gradually earns the right to keep their equity in a company. Equity typically “vests” over a set time period, known as a “vesting schedule,” or upon meeting other contractually defined criteria. The company is entitled by contract to buy back or reclaim unearned or “unvested” stock.

Implementing stock vesting with all service providers—founders, directors, employees, consultants, and advisors—is strongly recommended. Investors often use stock vesting to motivate company founders to stay and build value post-investment. Startup founders use it to ensure co-founders’ commitment and reward them for their efforts in building the company. Companies use it to retain dedicated employees and incentivize long-term goal achievement.

Historical practice and labor market competition have resulted in a standardized vesting schedule for startup employees. This typically spans four years, with 25% of equity vesting at a one-year cliff and the rest vesting monthly in equal amounts thereafter. Advisors usually have a two-year vesting schedule, with a three- or six-month cliff becoming increasingly common, and the remainder vesting monthly in equal amounts. Consultant vesting schedules are often based on deliverables and performance and can vary significantly. For efficiency, startups should apply standard vesting schedules consistently, but they can be adjusted to suit specific needs and circumstances.

The importance of stock vesting can be demonstrated with a hypothetical four-person founding team, each holding 25% of the company’s stock. Without a vesting schedule, a founder could leave at any time, retaining all their shares without further contributing to the company’s growth. If one founder leaves after six months, they would still retain 25% of the company’s stock, reaping all of the potential benefits with none of the work. This is unfair to the remaining founders and new hires who would continue to build the company. However, if a typical four-year vesting schedule with a one-year cliff had been applied, a founder leaving after six months would keep no shares, while the other three founders’ ownership would increase to 33% each. If any of them leave later, they would only retain the shares they’ve earned through their continuing work and tenure with the company.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.