Insights

Three Trends That Will Define AI in 2026

There has been a great deal of discussion surrounding the current artificial intelligence (AI) boom, as well as the potential for a bust reminiscent of the end of the dot com era. AI continues to predominate venture capital (VC) investment, with KMPG recently reporting that “VC investors continued to double down on AI in Q3’25, with companies developing AI models and platforms attracting many of the largest funding rounds of the quarter.” And this is showing no signs of slowing down.

While experts can debate whether we are in an AI bubble that could burst, unlike the boom cycles we have experienced in the past, this time, investors are becoming more selective. AI startup formation will no doubt continue its surge as we move into 2026, but funding will become even more concentrated among those companies that can demonstrate a real product-market fit and a credible plan for legal rights and regulatory compliance.

Below are three trends that we can expect to define the AI sector next year.

A Continued Shift in Investor Focus

The capital that is flowing into AI companies at historic levels is not doing so evenly, and this will continue into next year. The bulk of funding is being funneled to fewer, more mature companies. Savvy investors are no longer looking to simply finance experimentation, and most late-stage funding is going to a smaller number of well-capitalized market leaders, leaving many earlier stage companies operating under structural pressure. 

As we recently discussed at the 2025 TED AI conference, this has led to “a tale of two worlds,” with many earlier stage AI startups facing the challenge today of scaling revenue or retaining engineers amid intense talent poaching. So, the earlier stage startups in the AI space can no longer rely simply on their technical potential. They must prove they can trigger and sustain hyper-growth in revenue while retaining key engineering talent in a market where the larger companies can lure away top talent with compensation packages startups cannot match. 

Investors are also prioritizing those companies they feel can best withstand the legal and regulatory scrutiny that is ahead. This means founders must build an infrastructure from the start that can support not only technical growth, but also legal and regulatory durability long term.  That means having the legal rights to the data that your models are training on, and their outputs.  It also means complying with a complex web of interlocking regulatory structures that can be national, supra-national, regional, or even local.  While regulations have jurisdictional borders, AI tools can be accessed anywhere in the world.

A Shakeout Among Horizontal AI Startups

Next year, expect there to be a shakeout among horizontal AI startups that lack vertical specialization or agentic capabilities. Investors want to see companies solving domain-specific problems with proprietary data and actionable outputs. We are moving past the era of generic AI platforms to one of targeted, high-value solutions in regulated or operationally complex sectors. Capital will flow to those AI companies that own a problem, not just a model. The era of undifferentiated AI platforms is coming to an end. 

A Surge in M&A

At the same time as all of this is taking place, the capital markets are evolving in parallel. We have started to see the IPO window cautiously reopen, but public market entry is not likely to be the first source of liquidity for these VC-backed companies. Instead, 2026 will likely bring a rise in strategic mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and secondary transactions ahead of public listings. These “pre-exit” transactions will not only return capital to investors who have made it through a long liquidity cycle, but also help companies to strengthen their balance sheets ahead of a potential IPO.

At a time when capital is plentiful but selective, the next phase of AI expansion is not just about building breakthrough AI tools. Instead, 2026 is going to be about building AI businesses that can withstand legal, technical, and market scrutiny at scale. 

AUTHOR(S):

Louis Lehot
Natasha Allen

POSTED:

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.