Insights

Foley Secures Federal Circuit Victory for Fortress Iron in Patent Litigation

Foley & Lardner LLP secured a noninfringement ruling in a precedential decision at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court on behalf of Fortress Iron LP and Fortress Fence Products LLC (Fortress).

Foley defended Fortress following an August 2021 suit brought in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas by Barrette Outdoor Living alleging infringement of several patents related to fence assemblies. The patents at issue described internal connectors for fence panels that allowed pickets to pivot relative to rails. The connectors included features described with terms central to the dispute, including “boss,” “projection,” and “nub.”

Foley argued during claim construction at the district court that these terms should be limited in use to fastener-less structures that were integral with the connectors — an argument the district court accepted. Barrette’s infringement theory collapsed under this interpretation as the alleged infringing Fortress products used separate fasteners, rather than integral bosses. The district court handed down a judgment of noninfringement by Fortress.

Barrette appealed the judgment of noninfringement to the Federal Circuit, challenging the lower court’s construction of key patent terms as too narrow. On October 17, 2025, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s construction of the claims as limited to “integral bosses and projections,” upholding the judgment of noninfringement in favor of Fortress. The victory underscores Foley’s strength in complex patent litigation and appellate advocacy.

The Foley intellectual property litigation team was led by partner Paul Storm and of counsel Jake May.

AUTHOR(S):

POSTED:

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.