Insights

Accounting in M&A Deals – Navigating the Numbers

A key to success for any growth company is navigating the numbers, with success and visibility in accounting and finance, preferably up and to the right.  Nowadays, companies are experiencing accounting challenges as they grow their businesses, especially when the growth is through mergers and acquisitions (M&A). M&A transactions present both buyers and sellers with multiple challenges as complex requirements may result from acquisitions and company sales. Building the right process and bringing the right resources is essential for organizations to do good deals and succeed during the post-closing integration.   Following are some pro-tips on how to get it right from the start:

Due diligence

As part of the financial accounting due diligence, companies should prioritize analyzing the company’s assets, sales, cash flow, and GAAP earnings situation. In the due diligence exercise, the buyer should consider whether the target’s and the buyer’s financial statements were prepared using the same accounting principles (e.g., U.S. GAAP, IFRS as applied by IASB or something else) and the accounting practices followed. When companies enter M&A transactions, they often inherit dissimilar financial systems and charts of accounts, exposing them to more significant challenges related to reporting and compliance requirements. Buyers should understand these differences and how they affect buyers’ evaluation of the company’s operations. Failure to collect all of the relevant data creates additional challenges in financial, tax, statutory, and regulatory reporting capabilities. Architecting an accounting due diligence process allows a buyer to understand the transaction target early.

Designing post-closing purchase price adjustments in definitive agreements

Accounting plays a lead role in the definitive acquisition agreement, both in the definitions and the design.  Often, so-called “earn-out” clauses link subsequent purchase price payments to developing financial indicators (e.g., revenue or EBITDA). The determination of these key figures and the purchase price depends on the underlying accounting methods. The buyer and the company will want to calculate triggering financial indicators using their respective accounting methods. To the extent that they do not reconcile perfectly, the parties may agree to attach to the purchase agreement a sample calculation of the triggering indicators or additional parameters that should be used in determining whether a purchase price adjustment is appropriate. It is also customary to include a purchase price adjustment mechanism based on the net working capital of the company, in which the buyer will typically set a closing target net working capital amount as of the closing date, or “bogey”, and there will be a dollar-to-dollar adjustment if the actual net working capital amount as of the closing date ends up to be higher or lower than the bogey, whether determined at closing or later adjusted after audit. The buyer and the company will need to negotiate and agree upon the target level of net working capital required to be available at closing. A sample net working capital calculation schedule may help in avoiding potential disputes down the road. Additionally, the accounting system may play a role when evaluating force majeure clauses and possibly influence earn-out figures in events beyond the control of the contractual parties.

Preliminary purchase price allocation and post-merger integration

In addition, before signing a contract, buyer should reflect on how the financial reporting will change after closing. On the one hand, this concerns the acquiring company’s accounting treatment of the M&A transaction. Once the transaction has been completed, on the other hand, the target business and its financial statements have to be integrated within buyer’s financial statements (and separate carve-out financial statements or pro forma financial statements giving effect to the transaction in prior periods, may be required.  How the purchase price is allocated among the target assets compared to the carrying value of target’s assets in target’s or seller’s financial statements can have huge impacts of the deal’s returns.  Changes to the accounting may occur if the previously applied accounting between the acquiring company and the target company is different. If the buyer happens to be a public company, the Securities and Exchange Commission and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board might have requirements and deadlines or demand changes.

Complex intercompany agreements and transactions

During the M&A integration trek, companies often enter into multiple intercompany transactions where they transfer assets, liabilities, revenues, and costs to achieve business efficiencies and other integration goals. These transactions can involve intercompany agreements, increasing the risk of misstatement and unreconciled intercompany balances.

In Conclusion

During the M&A process, the importance of a strong financial and accounting process and team can not be underestimated in navigating the numbers.   Your business leaders, lawyers and bankers need to work closely with them to drive to the right goal posts.

AUTHOR(S):

Louis Lehot
Eric Chow

POSTED:

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.