Insights

A Short Primer for Startups on Local Labor and Employment Law Compliance

While keeping abreast of these rapidly evolving rules has always presented a management challenge.

Labor and employment law compliance can cause significant problems for businesses, no matter their size, and there is no de minimis exception for startups. Like death and taxes, changes in labor and employment laws in every jurisdiction are the only constant. While keeping abreast of these rapidly evolving rules has always presented a management challenge, in the era of global pandemics and what comes after, compliance has a totally new lens on it. The following is a brief overview.

In the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and other federal jurisdictional regimes, you should be mindful that national, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations can be applied in almost any relationship, whether it be employment, consulting, or some other form of agency. While one jurisdiction may require employers to provide paid sick leave or other benefits and send specific wage payment notices to all new employees, for example, stating their rates and dates of payment, another may not. Just because you are exempt under one jurisdiction does not mean you are exempt under the other.

One of the first mistakes that companies make when first starting out is that they assume that hiring their friend or family member leaves them exempt from labor and employment laws. Nothing could be further from the truth. Courts are likely to find an employer/employee relationship unless there is a clearly defined agreement saying otherwise. Therefore, it is imperative that companies realize that any employer/employee relationship will be governed by labor and employment laws, no matter how informal the arrangement.

A company must define whether or not a worker is an independent contractor or an unpaid intern. As mentioned, if a company fails to do so, the law interprets a poorly defined working relationship as an at-will relationship between the company and an employee. This will leave the company open to being liable for overtime pay, unforeseen taxes, and other employee benefits.

Compliance with federal, state, and local wage and hour laws for all personnel must be the rule.

In the United States, the best way for companies to do this is by classifying employees as exempt or non-exempt from the federal minimum wage and overtime laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Companies should also:

  • compensate all non-exempt employees with cash payments for at least minimum wage, plus any applicable overtime
  • ensure that any exempt employees are performing the job functions required to satisfy the criteria for exempt status under the FLSA and are paid the minimum threshold on a salary basis
  • comply with any state or local wage laws that may be more generous to employees than the FLSA.

In a written offer letter, employment agreement, or workplace policy, specify that the relationship is at-will. Of course, this does not prevent you from conferring severance or other benefits for key executives if the employment is terminated without cause.

This cannot be overstated! It is imperative that companies clearly define in all employee agreements that each employment relationship is at-will. If not, a company will leave its fate in the hands of a court’s interpretation. It is always better to clearly define all employee relationships in writing at the outset.

While it is generally a good idea to employ a professional organization, it would be a mistake to assume that any organization will protect a company from liability. It is always in the company’s best interest to ensure that they are in complete compliance with all applicable employment laws. Otherwise, they will still face any fees imposed on them as a result of an employment law violation.

AUTHOR(S):

Louis Lehot

POSTED:

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.