Insights

Foley Secures First Circuit Victory for Daimler Truck North America in Dormant Commerce Clause Dealer Law Appeal

Decision reinforces constitutional limits on state dealer laws and provides important guidance for suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors operating across state lines

Foley & Lardner LLP represented Daimler Truck North America LLC (DTNA) in a significant victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Rhode Island Truck Center, LLC v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC.

Rhode Island Truck Center LLC (RITC) had protested under Rhode Island’s motor vehicle dealer protection law, alleging that DTNA violated the statute by appointing a Freightliner dealer in neighboring Massachusetts within RITC’s contractual territory. RITC sought an order requiring DTNA to remove the Massachusetts dealership.

The First Circuit agreed with Foley’s argument that Rhode Island could not constitutionally enforce its dealer statute to regulate DTNA’s out-of-state dealership appointment. In its opinion issued July 6, 2026, the court held that such enforcement would violate the Dormant Commerce Clause by directly regulating an out-of-state transaction and potentially exposing DTNA to inconsistent state regulatory obligations. The decision distinguished Rhode Island’s law from statutes with a sufficiently strong in-state nexus, finding that the enforcement sought by RITC impermissibly implicated out-of-state commerce, competition, and dealership operations.

The ruling is particularly significant for suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors whose sales territories, dealer networks, or franchise relationships cross state lines. It provides meaningful guidance on the constitutional limits of state dealer statutes when those laws are invoked to restrict business and operational decisions in another state.

Foley’s appellate litigation team was led by partner Nathan Imfeld.

AUTHOR(S):

POSTED:

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.