Insights

Louis Lehot Publishes on Government Shutdown Risks for Companies Eyeing IPO

Foley & Lardner LLP partner Louis Lehot shared guidance for companies navigating an initial public offering amid federal government uncertainty in The National Law Journal article, “Government Shutdown: Companies Planning to Go Public Face Potential IPO Freeze.”

“For a company choosing to go public, timing is key,” Lehot writes. “There is a significant amount of planning and waiting for the right moment when there are favorable market conditions, investor sentiment, and industry-specific cycles. Any kind of a government shutdown could result in delays at the SEC, which could cause companies to miss a critical market window.”

The article details key takeaways for affected companies, including:

  • IPOs could be frozen if the SEC shuts down: A government shutdown could halt the SEC’s review of registration statements, effectively freezing IPO activity. Companies close to launching may be forced to delay pricing and closing, even if they’ve completed most of the process.
  • Delays can lead to higher costs and riskier market conditions: Extended timelines mean increased costs, from legal fees to updated financials. More critically, companies risk missing favorable market windows, which could impact valuation and investor interest.
  • Proactive planning is essential: Companies should accelerate filings while the government is still operational and prepare contingency plans. Staying flexible, maintaining transparent communication, and working closely with legal and financial advisors can help mitigate disruption.

“Proactive preparation can mean the difference between an IPO that is delayed versus derailed,” Lehot concludes. “This is the time to look at contingency plans and work closely with legal counsel and financial advisers to ensure everything is ready to go once the SEC is back in business.”

(Subscription required)

AUTHOR(S):

Louis Lehot

POSTED:

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.