Insights

Foley Secures Jury Trial Win for Pro Bono Client in Civil Rights Case

Foley & Lardner LLP recently secured a favorable jury verdict on behalf of a pro bono client in Harris v. Giese, No. 3:22-cv-00387-wmc (W.D. Wis.), a federal civil rights case involving the use of excessive force by a jail officer.

The case stemmed from a 2022 incident in which a Juneau County Sheriff’s Office officer deployed a Taser twice against the plaintiff, a former pretrial detainee, while his arms were handcuffed behind his back, and he was seated in a restraint chair surrounded by five officers. Proceeding pro se, the plaintiff sued defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the use of the Taser constituted excessive force in violation of the plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment rights.

In 2024, Foley accepted the case as a pro bono appointment from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. In a bifurcated three-day jury trial that concluded on April 2, 2025, the jury found that the plaintiff’s constitutional rights had been violated and awarded him $4,000 in compensatory damages and $6,000 in punitive damages.

At the conclusion of the trial, the court thanked Foley for representing the plaintiff on a pro bono basis.

The Foley trial team consisted of partner Naikang Tsao and associates Bryan Mette and Emily Jones, with support from Evan Bondoc, McKenzie Ahmet, Andrew Gresik, and Alexander Witz, and contributions from Samuel Robertson, Sophia Pfander, Katherine Plachta, Elliot Ambort, and Luisa Meyer.

AUTHOR(S):
POSTED:

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.