On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order rescinding the 2023 directive issued by former President Joe Biden on artificial intelligence (AI). Biden’s order outlined extensive measures aimed at guiding the development and use of AI technologies, including the establishment of chief AI officers in major federal agencies and frameworks for tackling ethical and security risks. This revocation signals a major policy change, transitioning away from the federal oversight put in place by the previous administration.
The move to revoke Biden’s executive order has led to a climate of regulatory uncertainty for companies operating in AI-driven fields. In the absence of a unified federal framework, businesses could encounter various challenges, such as an inconsistent regulatory landscape as states and international organizations intervene, increased risks related to AI ethics and data privacy, and unfair competition among companies that implement differing standards for AI development and deployment.
Looking Forward
In light of this shift, companies are encouraged to adopt proactive measures to navigate the evolving environment. To uphold trust and accountability, it is essential to bolster internal governance by creating or improving ethical guidelines concerning AI usage. Organizations should also invest in compliance by monitoring state, international, and industry-specific regulations to align with new standards like Colorado’s Artificial Intelligence Act and the EU’s AI Act.
Additionally, staying informed about possible federal policy changes and legislative efforts is crucial, as further announcements may signal new directions in AI governance. Collaborating with industry groups and standards organizations can help shape voluntary guidelines and best practices, while robust risk management frameworks will be essential to mitigate issues such as bias, cybersecurity threats, and liability concerns.
To navigate this evolving landscape, organizations should consider taking the following steps now:
- Strengthen Internal Governance: Develop or enhance internal AI policies and ethical guidelines to promote responsible and legally compliant AI use, even in the absence of federal mandates.
- Invest in Compliance: Stay updated on state, international, and industry-specific AI regulations that could impact operations. Proactively align practices with emerging standards such as Colorado’s Artificial Intelligence Act and the EU’s AI Act.
- Monitor Federal Developments: Keep a close eye on further announcements or legislative actions from Congress and federal agencies that could signal new directions in AI policy and regulation.
- Engage in Industry Collaboration: Collaborate with industry groups and standards organizations to help influence voluntary AI standards and best practices.
- Focus on Risk Management: Establish strong risk assessment frameworks to identify and address potential AI-related risks, including biases, cybersecurity threats, legal compliance, and liability concerns.
President Trump’s decision reflects a preference for less regulation, increasing the responsibility on the private sector to ensure ethical and safe AI usage. Companies need to navigate an uncertain regulatory landscape while innovating responsibly. As circumstances change, businesses must stay alert and flexible to uphold their competitive advantage and public trust.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.